IF BW EXPANSION PROJECT Purpose: Provide a parallel IF/LO system for the large telescope, with instantaneous BW of 4 GHz, tunable to provide overall coverage from approx 2 GHz through X-band. This system is needed to take good advantage of the impending 4-8 GHz receiver as well as other planned telecope improvements in the future. The existing IF/LO system will remain in place for the indefinite future as backup and to satisfy the needs of those users who are reluctant to switch horses in mid stream as well as of those users of the lowest-frequency receivers. NOTE: This project as defined for cost/labor estimates includes getting a collection of six 3-5 GHz signals down from the dome. What happens to the signals next is addressed by a separate discussion hereunder (Tail End Matrix...). Current Status: NOTE: One significant change has occurred to the architecture of the WBIF system, inspired by Phil's suggestion. Instead of operating in full parallel with the legacy system, the WBIF will now operate as a switch-selected alternative to the front end of the legacy system. The necessary redesign and analysis of the upstairs portion of the system has been completed. Just about all of the RF components for the upstairs portion have now been ordered and most of those parts are on hand, with the remaining ordered parts expected to arrive within a couple of months (most sooner). Additional thought and analysis has been given to the seemingly unrecognized downstairs portion of the WBIF system, but the detailed design has not yet commenced. I'm effectively treating this as a sort of skunkworks project. It's identity seems to have gotten lost in translation between the material I submitted for the supplemental proposal and what eventually came back as supported projects. At the moment I'm concentrating on getting things to the point where our new technician can begin building the upstairs part. Remaining Tasks Breakdown: > Identify a workable location & physical configuration in the dome. NOTE: a small portion of this system is expected to share space in the existing "RF selector switch" chassis (really a 'converter selector'). In its currently-unused "6th position" this switch will switch the RF signal into the new WBIF system. I am all but convinced that the best route will be to put most or all of the upstairs system in the left-hand blue rack in order to minimize RF cable lengths. A minimum goal is to put everything through the 2nd mixers in the left-hand side. The reflection coefficients of available components (even "high quality" attenuators) at the RF & 1st IF frequencies are high enough to lead to appreciable passband ripples, and I want to make these as coarse as possible through cable delay control. See appendix 1 ("Rearranging the Blue Racks") I am currently in the early stages of doing trial layouts (in CAD) of the RF components in realistic chassis models in order to convince myself that it will all really fit. > Build a thermal test chassis to verify that my thinking about how to adequately cool the 2nd mixer chassis is valid. This chassis includes three power-hungry frequency synthesizers for the 2nd LOs, and must dissipate something like 100W total. > Choose/order remaining parts: RF cabling, power, cooling, and packaging-related. Specifying RF cables and finding a quality vendor is likely to be a particularly time-consuming aspect of this. > Develop a power monitoring scheme. I think it's perhaps time to do something new here to replace the expensive Agilent power meters that we currently use for such purposes. I'm thinking of COTS ICs whose outputs are measured with a small A/D converter (probably part of a common microcontroller chip). As I see it there is little need for high accuracy- I view this as a system to get the levels in the ballpark, with final deternmination for setting being done by checking the A/D levels in the individual backend (rDBE, PUPPI, or whatever). > Design the control hardware for two step attenuators and for the three 2nd LO synthesizers and the level monitoring A/D. This is a subtask beyond my current capabilities, for which I must assume support from someone like Luis Quintero. > Build, test, and revise (if needed), the "upstairs" portion of the system in the lab. > Modify the "RF selector switch" chassis in the dome (may not be needed, depending on how things fit otherwise). > Install and commission the added "upstairs" portion of the system. "TAIL_END" IF MATRIX SYSTEM: Purpose: This is the "skunk works project" referred to above for doing something with the six 3-5 GHz IF signals brought down from the dome by the "IF BW Expansion Project". This system will handle distribution of IF signals from various sources (various receivers on the 305m system and however many 12m UDCs we have) into all sensible signal "sinks" (WAPPS/PDEV, PUPPI, rDBEs, etc) considering bandwidth requirements etc. See 'Main_IF_Matrix_8-rDBE.pdf' for a (strangely-musical) drawing depicting the possible interconnections, with colored dots indicating those cross connections that seem sensible to me. Also see 'IF_Matrix_Explanation.txt' for more info about how the paths are to be formed. Some of the paths are "straight through" in the sense that they do not require frequency conversion; however many other paths do require frequency conversions (generally including bandpass filtering as well). Note: while I think it's important to design this pretty thoroughly in one blinding flash of effort, the implementation could probably be piecemeal as needs (and suitable backend hardware) arise. This is how one might keep a fairly low profile budget-wise. Current Status: I have prepared the aforementioned 'musical-looking' interconnection diagram which attempts to empower the determination of needed signal paths. I have also put together a spreadsheet based on a very quick design effort (done for the supplemental proposal) to the component level of detail, so I could make some meaningful estimate of parts costs. I emphasize that this is not yet a polished design. I attempted to include sufficient complexity and detail to avoid the most obvious traps and leave some room for tweaking without risking big surprises in the cost department. Remaining Major Tasks (excluding the 'WB IF -> WAPPS/PDEV'): > Design detailed RF system, specify/choose/order parts. NOTE: Estimated parts cost is ~$70k > Determine where it will fit (WAPPs room?), devise packaging and cooling scheme, and specify/order those parts including power supplies. > Design & program local controllers for RF switches, attens, & synthesizers. > Build hardware. > Test/revise system. > Install system. > Perform software integration of this system into the observatory APPENDICES 1. Rearranging the Blue Racks Last week (approx 24 Oct) I studied the situation in the dome at length, and the first thing I found was that there is no way to do this without considerable rearrangement of existing stuff. I propose to move most or all of the relay drivers and other non-RF chassis over to the right-hand rack. Still allowing for running 2nd IF (3-5 GHz) across racks, this will fill up the right-hand rack and will also require deleting JHU/APL's RF power meter (used during our special S-band transmissions to illuminate the moon for LRO). Even so this is all going to be a tight squeeze and may require locating power supplies for the WBIF stuff outside the blue racks. This would be a headache from the RF shielding perspective, but is at least straight- forward in theory. Doing this will require extensive recabling of GPIB and other cables in the two racks. I plan to do this with a series of cable extenders so that these may be checked out ahead of the big move, then preinstalled in the shielded guide now running between the racks. The idea here is to do the rearrangement in a series of sufficiently small steps that each may be easily done in a single day's maintenance period with very little risk of leaving the observatory inoperative at the end of the day. An important precursor to all this will be to clean out the incredible rats nest of overly-long existing non-RF cables in the back of the left-hand blue rack. I'm convinced that a large part of the mess comprises AC power cables, and these should be replaced by new cables of minimal length and minimal wire gauge. Again, this can be done in little bits and pieces so as to avoid risking observatory operational integrity at the end of each working day. I'd like to see this effort commence ASAP.