sband wide/low (1.7 to 3.1 Ghz receiver)
sep04
The sband wide (sbw also called sband
low)
receiver covers 1.8 to 3.1 ghz. It has a quadridge OMT (native
linear
polarization) and a ying/kildal horn. The receiver was installed on the
telescope in 1999 (not sure of these dates). It never worked very well
because of the strong rfi at 1.940 Ghz (cellular phones) and the
2.4-2.5
ghz pcs band. A filter bank was built and installed that
had
filters at 1.7 -1.88, 2.04-2.4, and 2.6-3.1 ghz. With the filter bank
installed,
the receiver started to work reliably (out of saturation!!).
History
Recent
system performance measurements
Daily
monitoring of Tsys
Dewar
temperatures
Calibration measurements:
Miscellaneous:
cal values
rfi measurements
History:
- 29sep08: installed
new cal values. backdated to 18aug05.
- 10oct04: installed new cal values. backdated to 15aug04.
-
10sep04: new gain curve installed and back dated to be valid from
15may04.
-
14may04: cal diodes replaced.
-
14may04: horn moved down in focus direction to put it in focus.
-
29apr04: horn moved x,y direction after feed survey (focus motion not
yet
done).
-
1999-14may2004 The measured
system temperature drifted from 1999 thru 14may2004. This was
caused
by the cal diodes drifting. On 14may04 the diodes were replaced and the
measured system temperature stabilized.
Calibration
measurements:
recent
system
performance measurements
26may08: cal values measured
using sky and absorber.
may04-sep04: sbw GAIN CURVES.
may04-sep04: System performance
of data used for gain curves.
09jul04:
cal values measured using sky and absorber
15aug03:
cal values measured using sky and absorber
20sep01:
cal values measured using sky and absorber.
Miscellaneous:
07jun05:
time for sbw dewar to cool down.
09may03:
resonances in the sbw receiver.
May04 to Sep04
fit
GAIN CURVES to calib data. (top...)
link
to gain curve plot
Gain curves were fit to the sband wide
calibration
gain data using 15may04 through 01sep04. The start of this
epoch was after the cals were replaced and the horn had been lowered
put
it in focus. The plots show the gain data (black) and the fits
(red)
for 2212, 2380, 2690, and 2850 Mhz. These gain equations were installed
on 10sep04 and back data to be valid starting on 15may04.
-
Fig 1 shows the az,za distribution for the data. The fit used a linear
fit
in za up to za=14. Above 14 degrees terms in (za-14)^2 and
(za-14)^3
were included. The fit also included 1az, 2az, and 3az sin, cos
terms.
-
Fig 2 plots the gain data and the fit to za. The fit equation is
printed with the sigma for the fit (in K/Jy).
-
Fig 3 plots the fit residuals (data-fit) vs za.
The fit used the za and the azimuth terms. We
probably
could have use a little better az,za coverage. I included the az terms
(instead of just a za fit) because it looked like the 1az term had a
significant
amplitude.
The 2690 freq fit had a lot more scatter than the
other 3 frequencies. If you look at the system performance data for
this
data set you'll see that the gain and cals were jumping around but the
sefd was solid. The problem is most likely being caused by rfi in the
cal
measurement.
The routine gainget() or corhgainget() will now
return
the sbw gain for data after 15may04 from these
equations. The coefficients can be found in the ascii file
data/gain.datR7
(this is provided in the AO idl
distribution for correlator routines). You can also find a copy of
it at AO in /pkg/rsi/local/libao/phil/data/gain.datR7.
Be careful using these routines for data before 15may04. There is not
gain curve and the routine should return and
status reflecting that...
processing: x101/sbw/sep04/dogainfit.pro
may04 to
sep04
: System performance of data used to compute gain curves. (top...)
Heiles calibration scans done from 15may04
(new cals, horn lowered) thru 01sep04 were used to measure the
system performance. This data was then used to compute the gain curves
for use on data taken after 15may04.
The first set of plots show
the system performance with all frequencies overplotted. The
sources
are identified
by symbol and the frequencies by color.
-
Fig 1 shows the distributions on the dish of the measurements.
-
Fig 2 has the Gain in Kelvins/Jansky. This relies on the cals and the
source
flux. The next plot is Tsys vs za in Kelvins followed by the
SEFD
(System Equivalent Flux density) in Janskies / Tsys. At the bottom is
the
average beam width in arc seconds.
-
Fig 3 plots the coma parameter, first sidelobe height below the peak,
the
main beam efficiency, followed by the main beam + 1st sidelobe beam
efficiency.
-
Fig 4 has the pointing errors in az,za.
The second set of plots has the
data plotted separately for each frequency. The colors and symbols
are used to differentiate the sources. The figures are:
-
Fig 1 2212Mhz Gain,Tsys . 260 points
-
Fig 2 2212 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
-
Fig 3 2380 Mhz Gain,Tsys 260 points.
-
Fig 4 2380 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies.
-
Fig 5 2690 Mhz Gain,Tsys 151 points.
-
Fig 6 2690 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
-
Fig 7 2850 Mhz Gain,Tsys 259 points.
-
Fig 8 2850 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
The data for 2690 is jumping around a lot more than the other 3
frequencies.
The gain and tsys jump but the sefd is relatively stable. The cal
measurement
is probably getting rfi in the cal on or the cal off causing tsys,gain
to jump around.
processing: x101/sbw/sep04/doit.pro
home_~phil