There is a similar set of low cals (that go through a 10 db coupler). The table below shows the receiver name, frequency range of the receiver, frequency where the system temperature is measured, and the cals that are available.high uncorrelated cal with 2 diodes (diode1->polA,diode2->polB) high correlated cal with 1 diode (diode1->polA,diode1->polB) high uncorrelated cal with crossover (diode2->polA,diode1->polB) high correlated cal with 90 deg phase shift (diode2->polA,diode2_90degphase shift->polB)
| receiver | freq. range Mhz |
cals | freq. (Mhz) of measurement |
| 327 | 312-347 | 1 correlated cal | 327 |
| 430 | 425-435 | all 8 cals | 431 |
| 800 |
700-800 |
1 correlated cal | 740 |
| lbw | 1120-1730 | all 8 cals | 1400 |
| alfa |
1220-1520 |
1 correlated |
1375-1520 |
| sbw | 1800-3100 | all 8 cals | 2290 |
| sbn | 2330-2430 | 1 correlated cal | 2380 |
| sbh | 3000-4000 | all 8 cals | 3500 |
| cband | 3850-6000 | all 8 cals | 5000 |
| xband | 8000-10000 | all 8 cals | 8800 |
line0: Thu Jan 1 16:19:47 2004 az/za lst: 270.0004
10.0000
22:36:05
line1: rcv 5 1400.0 6 3 0 if1 -40.78 -40.17
if2
-54.59 -54.28 cor 0.91 0.94 11 11
line2: 5 hcal 9.550
9.810
27.8 27.2
| line 0 columns | line 0 col descriptions |
| Thu Jan 1 16:19:47 2004 | date |
| 270.0004 10.0000 22:36:05 | azimuth, zenith angle, lst when data was taken. |
| line 1 columns | line 1 col descriptions |
| rcv 5 | receiver numbers: 1-327,2-430,3=610,5-lbw,6-lbn,7-lbw,9-cband,11-xband,12-sbn |
| 1400.0 | frequency in Mhz where the data was taken |
| 6 | bandwidth number: 2-25,3-12.5,4-6.25,5-3.125,6-1.5... |
| 3 | integration time in seconds for cal |
| 0 | lbw hybrid. 0 out, 1 in |
| if1 -40.78 -40.17
|
pwr dbm measured with upstairs power meter. -40 is optimal for lbw,lbn,sbn -32 is optimal for cband,sbw,xband, 430,327 can have less (say -48) since they are narrower bands. |
| if2 -54.59 -54.28 | power in dbm from the downstairs power meter. |
| cor 0.91 0.94 | correlator 0 lag pola,polB. This is the ratio of
measured to
optimum
power. If the value is far from 1 then the power levels were wrong (say 20%) |
| 11 11 | The attenuator values used at the correlator
(polA,polB) The attenutaors go 0 to 15 db |
| line 2 columns | line 2 col descriptions |
| 5 | receiver number |
| hcal
|
H is high cal, L is lowCal, D1 is diode 1,D2 is
diode2 H/Lcal: uncorrelated cal (two diodes) D1->pola,D2->polB L/Lxcal: uncorrelated cross over (two diodes) D1->polB,D2->polB H/Lcorcal: correlated cal (one diode). D1->polA,D1->polB H/L90cal: correlate 90deg phaseshift cal. D2->polA,D2+90deg->polB |
| 9.550 9.810 | Calvalue in kelvins used (polA,polB) |
| 27.8 27.2 | Tsys computed in kelvins (polA,polB |
|
| 327,800 |
gr430,ch430 |
lbw |
alfa |
sbn,sbw |
sbh,cband |
cbh,xband |
|
| YearToDate |
|
.ps .pdf |
|
.ps .pdf |
|
|
|
| 2012 |
|
.ps .pdf |
|
.ps .pdf |
|
|
|
| 2011 |
|
.ps .pdf |
|
.ps .pdf |
|
|
|
| 2010 |
|
.ps .pdf |
|
.ps .pdf |
|
|
|
| 2009 |
|
gr430,ch430 |
|
.ps .pdf |
|
|
|
| 2008 |
|
gr430,ch430 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2007 |
|
gr430,ch430 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2006 |
|
gr430,ch430 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2005 |
|
gr430,ch430 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|||
| 1999 |
|
|
|
|
The system temperature is taken daily and then
recorded.
If the cals are changed, then it may take awhile for the new cal
values
to be measured. So there may be periods of time when old cal
values are
being used on new cal diodes. When the new cal values are
installed ,
you
could see a jump in the system temperature. You should be able to
identify
these jumps by going to the cal
values page and looking to see when the new cal values were
installed.
Gradual drifts in TsysA-TsysB are probably problems with the cal
diodes
drifting.
home_~phil